1st Gen Dakota Tech 1987 - 1996 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 1st Gen Dakota.

Radiator Swap problems....solution?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 07-08-2016, 07:47 AM
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
93 ragtop is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Va
Posts: 1,784
Received 97 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Hello Robert,

I can tell you the thickness of the timing cover is very close to 2.5 in. getting my tape in there was not easy with everything on the motor.

This picture shows the measurement from the timing cover forward.
Name:  20160708_071129_zpsa1fbvqwd.jpg
Views: 284
Size:  133.7 KB

here is a dist. picture
Name:  20160708_071954_zpsq9o88ogw.jpg
Views: 254
Size:  172.4 KB


I found some shelby info. I believe you will find interesting. I will post it seperate from this entry
 
  #62  
Old 07-08-2016, 07:51 AM
robertmee's Avatar
robertmee
robertmee is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Right here in our own backyard: https://dodgeforum.com/forum/1st-gen...or-v8-dak.html

The shelby did use a different position...hell it used the front engine mounts to get there. There are pictures of the motor sitting in the frame. Also confirms that the Shelby used the same LA water pump and Rock Auto is full of sh$$. I can also tell the motor is sitting back as the valve covers are much closer to the firewall.

https://dodgeforum.com/forum/attachm...-dak-2.jpg.jpg
 

Last edited by robertmee; 07-08-2016 at 07:55 AM.
  #63  
Old 07-08-2016, 07:52 AM
robertmee's Avatar
robertmee
robertmee is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks 93....my measurements exactly, and at least confirms my motor is sitting in the right spot
 
  #64  
Old 07-08-2016, 07:58 AM
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
93 ragtop is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Va
Posts: 1,784
Received 97 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I found this Shelby page and it shows unique part numbers to the Shelby Dakota vs standard Dakota

http://www.shelbyregistry.com/1989dakotaupl.html


About half way down they show the Engine front support bracket
Left 4112853
Right 3892272

Engine mount insulator
4088033

Now I started checking the left mount 4112853 and of course its discontinued. But I did find by searching the number it was used on 84 and 88 5.2L ramchargers.
Thats as far as I got, but hopefully this may help you.

Oh, I do have this picture of the engine mount on my truck. And FWIW I guess its possible, but I would not have thought that Shelby would have moved the frame perch. Its welded.
Name:  20160708_072405_zpsleuszr7g.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  161.5 KB
 
  #65  
Old 07-08-2016, 08:00 AM
robertmee's Avatar
robertmee
robertmee is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the pic 93, but if my previous post is true, Shelby didn't use the mid mounts....They used the front mounts and a special cross member, hence the different mount part numbers.
 
  #66  
Old 07-08-2016, 08:03 AM
robertmee's Avatar
robertmee
robertmee is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

From Bill55az build thread....He copied the shelby mounts "Mounts are done....and I ended up pushing the motor back a bit over an inch."
 
  #67  
Old 07-08-2016, 08:08 AM
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
93 ragtop is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Va
Posts: 1,784
Received 97 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Robert, not sure if yours mounts like mine, but if so, would it be possible to take the upper portion of the mount, cut the part off that bolts to the block, Then take a 1/4 in. steel plate, drill the engine mounting holes, then weld it back together, but moving the motor back an inch or so?
It would be beyond my abilities, but I feel sure it could be fabricated.
One thing I have learned from this post. When I convert mine to V8 it will be with the serp. belt.
 
  #68  
Old 07-08-2016, 08:54 AM
robertmee's Avatar
robertmee
robertmee is offline
Record Breaker
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My mounts are different....they are the barrel type...I'd have to move the entire perch.


 
  #69  
Old 07-08-2016, 09:09 AM
93 ragtop's Avatar
93 ragtop
93 ragtop is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Va
Posts: 1,784
Received 97 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Is there a reason why you would not want to convert to a serp. belt system? Moving the motor back, at the least is going to make it harder to pull the transmission after everything is done.
And if you sink the radiator into the support, then you would have to put your fans where the condenser is now. That in turn is going to eliminate the possibility of AC.
 
  #70  
Old 07-08-2016, 10:17 AM
Lirra's Avatar
Lirra
Lirra is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://dodgeforum.com/forum/1st-gen...d-v8-swap.html

I use the OEM radiator and have a 318 LA engine. Pulled the engine approx. 3/4" rearwards. The transmission crossmember bolt hole slots were enlarged.
 


Quick Reply: Radiator Swap problems....solution?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.