1st Gen Durango 1998 - 2003 Durango's

The BS Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 01-17-2014, 12:59 AM
PublicHair's Avatar
PublicHair
PublicHair is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by that_guy
My parents have an 09 Wrangler 2dr. It's better than the old ones on the road, but compared to my Durango it has bricks for suspension. It does have a 3" lift though which probably doesn't help.




I've heard that the ecoboosts like to throw rods through the block
Eh..if it’s under warranty - who gives a ****. I don’t.
 
  #52  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:02 AM
adukart's Avatar
adukart
adukart is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,315
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PublicHair
His POS F150 just couldn’t keep up.. howling like a **** as well.

But it makes me curious to see how much the eco-boost F150s perform these days.
Those 5.4l's were garbage for power. I have friends that are ford guys and don't like them. The ecoboost is well, kind of a joke just like the 5.4. Even though all around are better still not up to the hype. My best friend bought a 2007 chevy 1500 classic 4dr lt3 5.3l z71 4spd auto with 3.73's in it last summer. Its a really nice truck and at the time he only had an exhaust on it. He raced an new ecoboost uphill. Up to 55mph the ecoboost had him by a truck length, by 90mph he had 2 truck lengths. On flat ground he won by 3 and were even at 55mph.
 
  #53  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:06 AM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy
that_guy is offline
Champion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA or Columbia, SC
Posts: 4,098
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PublicHair
Eh..if it’s under warranty - who gives a ****. I don’t.

I read online about a guy that had his replaced under warranty for throwing a rod, and then the replacement did the same within a month or so.
 
  #54  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:07 AM
PublicHair's Avatar
PublicHair
PublicHair is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by adukart
Those 5.4l's were garbage for power. I have friends that are ford guys and don't like them. The ecoboost is well, kind of a joke just like the 5.4. Even though all around are better still not up to the hype. My best friend bought a 2007 chevy 1500 classic 4dr lt3 5.3l z71 4spd auto with 3.73's in it last summer. Its a really nice truck and at the time he only had an exhaust on it. He raced an new ecoboost uphill. Up to 55mph the ecoboost had him by a truck length, by 90mph he had 2 truck lengths. On flat ground he won by 3 and were even at 55mph.
Damn that’s sad. That’s all we are ordering now is new Fords (was dodge the last few years). But I think ours are coming with the 6.4L ?

I forget. Need to look bakc on the fleet list.
 
  #55  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:11 AM
adukart's Avatar
adukart
adukart is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,315
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Fords towing v8 is a 6.2l very similar to GM's 6.2 just, how do I put this, a fail at vvt. Look at the dyno charts on hypertech programmers website. The thing looks like a heartbeat monitor. I'd take a gm 6.0 or ram 5.7 just from experience. The new 6.4l hemi truck motor drives with lots of low end compared to the 5.7 though.
 
  #56  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:25 AM
PublicHair's Avatar
PublicHair
PublicHair is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a 2012 5.7 hemi crew can and it's slow on the low end. Tho only 11k miles on it..

I think that's why I liked my Titan power through the whole RPM range.
 
  #57  
Old 01-17-2014, 07:51 AM
AppelH's Avatar
AppelH
AppelH is offline
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Central Washington
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've heard (not sure if it's true) that they really castrate the new trucks to protect their warranty interests so people are not doing burnout left and right and screwing things up. I think a good tuner would solve it and really open things up.
 
  #58  
Old 01-17-2014, 08:44 AM
JeeperDon's Avatar
JeeperDon
JeeperDon is offline
All Star
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

$45000 is about $500/mo for 6 yrs, $6 grand a year. Between Oct '12 and Oct '13 I spent $5,500 on my '01 R/T, but now the 'payments' are done for a while. Even if the motor takes a crapper, it's still less than a year of more of new D payments.

It 100% boils down to if you still enjoy driving/owning the older Durango. If you see the Durango in your garage when you're there to maybe take out the garbage and your first reaction is a happy thought, keep it.
 
  #59  
Old 01-17-2014, 09:31 PM
adukart's Avatar
adukart
adukart is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 2,315
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Yeah the new 6.4 could still do a good burnout even in a 3500, its just very easy to tell its held back by the programming.
 
  #60  
Old 01-17-2014, 09:58 PM
PublicHair's Avatar
PublicHair
PublicHair is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JeeperDon
$45000 is about $500/mo for 6 yrs, $6 grand a year. Between Oct '12 and Oct '13 I spent $5,500 on my '01 R/T, but now the 'payments' are done for a while. Even if the motor takes a crapper, it's still less than a year of more of new D payments.

It 100% boils down to if you still enjoy driving/owning the older Durango. If you see the Durango in your garage when you're there to maybe take out the garbage and your first reaction is a happy thought, keep it.
Uhh.. your math is off.

6yr = 72 months. $45,000 / 72 month = $625 a month. And that’s at 0%.. good luck with that. Very very few people qualify for 0%.

Heck, mine is at 1.9% and I think that equals a total of $1,200 in interest..
 


Quick Reply: The BS Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.