surviving through mods
#21
#23
![Default](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: brute
So you're going to ban me because I have different ideas than you and have had different experiences with certain parts than you?
So you're going to ban me because I have different ideas than you and have had different experiences with certain parts than you?
I am not a rookie by any means with neon parts. I know alot of people who also have alot of experience with parts. My knowledge comes from their experience as well. You're the first one to speak out against the Pacesetter header and now the Unorthodox UDP.
#24
#25
#26
![Default](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
wow...this post sure is getting heated....too bad i didnt get my hands in earlier[:@]
i had the pacesetter on my old r/t.....never had any problems with the welds or leaks....only problem i had was with the new flared piece of pipe they included for the nuckle.....that wore out on me...
otherwise it sis pretty good and i had it on the car for about 50,000 miles....its been hanging on the wall sincei got rid of the car and im still debating if i want to put it on the work car or not![Wink](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
i liked it....but thats just me...and das too
i had the pacesetter on my old r/t.....never had any problems with the welds or leaks....only problem i had was with the new flared piece of pipe they included for the nuckle.....that wore out on me...
otherwise it sis pretty good and i had it on the car for about 50,000 miles....its been hanging on the wall sincei got rid of the car and im still debating if i want to put it on the work car or not
![Wink](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
i liked it....but thats just me...and das too
![Big Grin](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#27
![Default](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: dysphagia
it is widely known in the 4g63 and srt4 community that eliminating the harmonic dampner on a inline 4 not only reduces power but also reduces engine life.
it is widely known in the 4g63 and srt4 community that eliminating the harmonic dampner on a inline 4 not only reduces power but also reduces engine life.
I can't speak for SRT-4's or the 4g63 world, but in the 1st gen neon world they work great.
#29
![Default](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: das2123
So you are saying that a UDP reduces HP? It actually frees up HP, again dyno proven, rather than create HP. The unorthodox pulley is one of the best ones out there also.
So you are saying that a UDP reduces HP? It actually frees up HP, again dyno proven, rather than create HP. The unorthodox pulley is one of the best ones out there also.
![Wink](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#30
![Default](https://dodgeforum.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: das2123
So you are saying that a UDP reduces HP? It actually frees up HP, again dyno proven, rather than create HP. The unorthodox pulley is one of the best ones out there also.
I can't speak for SRT-4's or the 4g63 world, but in the 1st gen neon world they work great.
ORIGINAL: dysphagia
it is widely known in the 4g63 and srt4 community that eliminating the harmonic dampner on a inline 4 not only reduces power but also reduces engine life.
it is widely known in the 4g63 and srt4 community that eliminating the harmonic dampner on a inline 4 not only reduces power but also reduces engine life.
I can't speak for SRT-4's or the 4g63 world, but in the 1st gen neon world they work great.