2nd Gen RAM general discussion/NON-tech This section is for general discussions about your 2nd gen RAM. Non tech related RAM threads belong here.

Dodge Ram Fuel Saver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
95RAM360's Avatar
95RAM360
Thread Starter
|
Grand Champion
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,971
Likes: 45
From: MAINE
Default Dodge Ram Fuel Saver

ok today on Xtreme 4x4 the whole episode was a 96 Ram 1500 getting 8 mpgs.

they put an electrical fan in, and got 1.5 mpg's

took out all acess weight and got .5 mpg

Swapped out for D60 axles with 4.10 gears and got 5 mpg's

Put manual locking hubs on because the fron diff parts are always turning with auto hubs. by putting on manual hubs it takes all the stress out of front diff, and it doesnt turn all the parts.


overall by doing those, they got the truck up to 16.5 miles per gallon. and they had 35's on it.


thought many would think this is interesting...
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #2  
mikentiff's Avatar
mikentiff
Professional
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks I was about to make a thread about it because I only caught the end of the show....I thought with 35's you should go with 4.56 though ?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
95RAM360's Avatar
95RAM360
Thread Starter
|
Grand Champion
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,971
Likes: 45
From: MAINE
Default

they had 4.10's and still got those numbers......and they went wheeling and it did great even with the bad u-joint he said he had lol
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #4  
BigRedRam95's Avatar
BigRedRam95
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 2
From: WV
Default

I also watched that
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #5  
mikentiff's Avatar
mikentiff
Professional
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Default

Did they ever say if it had the 5.2 or 5.9 ? I have a 5.2 and so now I'm wondering if I should still go with 4.56 lol
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:17 PM
  #6  
BigRedRam95's Avatar
BigRedRam95
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 2
From: WV
Default

I have a 1995 with a 5.2. I have 4.10s with 265/75/16. I have a heavy duty front bumper and get 15-16.5 mpg without all that other stuff they put on there truck.
Name:  IMG_0433.jpg
Views: 45
Size:  64.0 KB
 

Last edited by BigRedRam95; Dec 5, 2010 at 12:19 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #7  
mikentiff's Avatar
mikentiff
Professional
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Default

yeah but they had bigger tires and I'm about to go with 35's
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #8  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,465
Likes: 4,220
From: Clayton MI
Default

Gotta look at cost/benefit ratio as well though. How much did they spend to convert the front end to manual locking hubs? Most kits I have seen are close to a thousand bucks for that kind of behavior...... and for the minimal amount of money saved on gas, I don't really see that one as worth while. Now, granted, it will also be cheaper on maintenance.... but, for the money spent on the conversion, you can replace your hub/bearing units several times...... (depending on pricing. based on 'average' costs.)
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
95RAM360's Avatar
95RAM360
Thread Starter
|
Grand Champion
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,971
Likes: 45
From: MAINE
Default

they said thats where it can hurt the wallet....they got the D60's for around $1000, and they never mentioned a price for the hubs.....bu it does soun like a good direction to head for a project



and i ge 13-14 city as it is with mine....im just thinking of how much better it can be if i do the upgrades........think if you did it to yours, you could possibly end with 20 mpg's
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #10  
DukesOfHazzard's Avatar
DukesOfHazzard
Record Breaker
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
Default

My ram fuel saver = 500 cash on a 85 2dr hatch subaru
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.