Mopar M1 Intake
#21
08-24-2010 | 08:46 PM
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 2
From: Battle Ground WA
OK here we go, someone finally did a dyno of them all.
Both the M1 and AG are well bellow the Kegger in low end torque, the AG had a 5-12 ft-lb advantage over the M1 until 3800 RPMS.
Like I said, anyone who says they didn't feel a low end loss with the AG only thinks that because they were told that.
Both the M1 and AG are well bellow the Kegger in low end torque, the AG had a 5-12 ft-lb advantage over the M1 until 3800 RPMS.
Like I said, anyone who says they didn't feel a low end loss with the AG only thinks that because they were told that.
#23
08-24-2010 | 09:44 PM
Captain
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
#24
08-24-2010 | 09:50 PM
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 82,821
Likes: 3,435
From: Clayton MI
If the person that did the dyno testing only swapped manifolds, I would like to know what the rest of the engine specs were, as something else was more than likely holding back.
That, and you can't expect stellar results from changing ONE part of SYSTEM.
#26
08-24-2010 | 10:03 PM
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
It isn't about wet or dry flow, its about runner length/design.
If the person that did the dyno testing only swapped manifolds, I would like to know what the rest of the engine specs were, as something else was more than likely holding back.
That, and you can't expect stellar results from changing ONE part of SYSTEM.
If the person that did the dyno testing only swapped manifolds, I would like to know what the rest of the engine specs were, as something else was more than likely holding back.
That, and you can't expect stellar results from changing ONE part of SYSTEM.
#28
08-24-2010 | 10:06 PM
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 2
From: Battle Ground WA
It isn't about wet or dry flow, its about runner length/design.
If the person that did the dyno testing only swapped manifolds, I would like to know what the rest of the engine specs were, as something else was more than likely holding back.
That, and you can't expect stellar results from changing ONE part of SYSTEM.
If the person that did the dyno testing only swapped manifolds, I would like to know what the rest of the engine specs were, as something else was more than likely holding back.
That, and you can't expect stellar results from changing ONE part of SYSTEM.
When I dyno my truck next month I'll do both the stock and Mopar PCM, the Mopar PCM is a huge gain in low end and I believe I have more low end than stock, the tires seem to think so too. We'll see what the dyno says. And since I have a 5 speed I can dyno at whatever RPM I want and not worry about the tranny trying to downshift on me.
#30
08-24-2010 | 10:15 PM
Champion
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2
From: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
How do you likie the remote trubo Hans? THere was a guy from buinicdodge that laid out a remote turbo dyno at 6-8 lbs of boost and the numbers were right in line with what I am looking for (stock engine).
Seems like a good price and "relatively" easy to tune.
http://www.bionicdodge.com/bionic/in...p?topic=9467.0
Seems like a good price and "relatively" easy to tune.
http://www.bionicdodge.com/bionic/in...p?topic=9467.0