2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

As far as injectors go:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 12-29-2010, 10:57 PM
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
CPTAFW163 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you want, you can get these injectors and not need a custom tune:
http://www.fiveomotorsport.com/fuel-...rs/?itemid=108
19 lb/hr 4 hole disc design. Better throttle response and atomization. They are the same resistance and impedance (high) as our injectors.
Cheaper here though:
http://fuelinjectorconnection.com/sh...d&productId=81
^^ Also the site that sells those injectors is the same shop that made the video below.

Featured in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emnax2J4FX4
Best atomization of the bunch. I have the ones on the LEFT in my truck...so with all that gas, you can see why I needed a custom tune. This is the flow rate at 49 PSI.
 

Last edited by CPTAFW163; 12-29-2010 at 10:59 PM.
  #12  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:26 PM
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Ugly1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,123
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeram07
Engine Years Flow rate in lb/hr
5.2 Magnum 92-95 18.2
5.2 Magnum 96-01 23.2
5.9 Magnum 93-95 24.5
5.9 Magnum 96-01 23.2


just put stock back in a save the trouble
Good info thanks. You don't know the pressures for the years do you?
 
  #13  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:40 PM
CPTAFW163's Avatar
CPTAFW163
CPTAFW163 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft Campbell, KY/TN
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ugly, I am pretty sure that they are all 49 PSI. My 1996 and 2001 were identical.
 
  #14  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:52 PM
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Ugly1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,123
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I wonder if injector spec sheets show a volume vs pressure graph...since I'm OBD1 (edit and I should add not ready to contact B&G about my current stepping stone combo) I think I'd need the graph to consider anything but stock injectors. Maybe a call to the factory is in order for me. Ask some apps sales dude at Bosch or somewhere if they could hook mye up with a model "3" or something equivalent that would work in my rig without a reprogram. Give me some modern spray characteristics at stock volumes , pressures, duty cycle/s.
 
  #15  
Old 12-30-2010, 12:26 AM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CPTAFW163
Ugly, I am pretty sure that they are all 49 PSI. My 1996 and 2001 were identical.
94 and 95 are 39PSI.


I believe the actual dodge parts books states that 94-95 injectors are rated at 24.6lb/hr@39PSI. You'd need aftermarket injectors rated at 26lb/hr@43.5PSI to match them.


Basically, unless you know what you're doing and have a way to tune it, don't fix what isn't broken.
 
  #16  
Old 12-30-2010, 12:39 AM
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Ugly1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,123
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
I believe the actual dodge parts books states that 94-95 injectors are rated at 24.6lb/hr@39PSI. You'd need aftermarket injectors rated at 26lb/hr@43.5PSI to match them.
Well there it is! Not to question the data but just curious how you arrived at that conclusion.

Basically, unless you know what you're doing and have a way to tune it, don't fix what isn't broken.
You got that right. It's always amazing how involved this stuff can get even in a completely lateral move like this injector swap would ideally turn out to be if everything went perfectly. Any ideas on good 26# candidates?
 
  #17  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:37 AM
Hahns5.2's Avatar
Hahns5.2
Hahns5.2 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Battle Ground WA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ugly1
Well there it is! Not to question the data but just curious how you arrived at that conclusion.
A member on the Dakota forums posted this up a while ago
 
  #18  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:21 AM
Ugly1's Avatar
Ugly1
Ugly1 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,123
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hahns5.2
A member on the Dakota forums posted this up a while ago

I guess what I really meant was: What is the correct way to do the conversion to know what an injectors output is at 39psi is when all the info you have is for example it's a 26#/hr at 43.5psi? Is there a chart you refer to or is it some conversion formula?
 
  #19  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:56 AM
drewactual's Avatar
drewactual
drewactual is offline
Champion
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Carteret NC
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

see, this is where injectors get deep, as I was saying..

lets say TWO injectors are rated 22.5# @ 43.5psi.. which would lead you to believe, using the conversions we would assume is constant, you would be 25# @ 49psi.. (I'm not saying that is accurate, I'm just using that as an example)..

lets say one of those injectors uses a tiny valve that opens 3/4 of the way @ 43.5psi, and, in effect, leaves a little wiggle room for greater flow IF the charge on them is greater (in terms of volts) and the psi forces the valve open 100% of the way when the tiny valve is released.. lets say THAT injector allows for 25#'s in those conditions..

The OTHER injector, let's say is opening @ 100% @ 43.5psi, and is constrained to tighter tolerances as far as voltages go.. We don't know HOW much is going to go through that thing.. It may be a ton more, or it may be a lot lesser..

The only way to know is to test them like in that video.. some injectors will lose their atomization characteristics under greater pressure and just stream fuel.. some will just make a bigger/wider cloud of atomized fuel under greater pressure..

Choosing the right one is a dang JOB...

The easiest thing to do is to use the OEM ones.. A little risk is involved in using others rec'd by actual users.. a LOT of risk is involved by using printed specs alone.. If you're too rich, you are going to blow pretty little holes in your pistons...

I say all of this, and my intent is to install 22# injectors this afternoon, that landed at my door earlier this week.. I did some studying on it though, and feel fairly confident that I'm going to be okay.. I went with the 4hole mustang OE replacements.. It should be good.. we'll see..
 
  #20  
Old 12-30-2010, 10:25 AM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is offline
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 82,520
Likes: 0
Received 3,390 Likes on 3,130 Posts
Default

Injector flow ratings are NOT consistent. Different companies use different specs. To really know what is going on, we would need to know what pressure the injector is rated at, and what DUTY CYCLE. (which I think Drew was also addressing.) a 24 pound injector rated at 80% duty cycle is going to last longer than a 24 pound injector rated at 100% duty cycle. (Duty cycle is the percentage of time the injector is open.)

Not everyone publishes the specs for just how their injectors are rated. (at one time, very FEW of them did, its getting better.... but, still has a ways to go.)
 


Quick Reply: As far as injectors go:



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM.