2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Valve Timing Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #31  
billcart's Avatar
billcart
Professional
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

+1 Will do. Thanks HeyYou.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:49 PM
  #32  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by MeanMagnum99
Well I bought that set you recommended. So you said I shouldn't need the tensioner with this set correct? Now with advancing the cam timing 4* will my 1.7 roller rockers be ok?
You should be fine with the stock cam's specs. No trensioner should be necessary with the JP chain. Just be sure you don't force the gear on the crank snout, test fit the gears without the chain first, sand it out a bit if necessary, and do the best you can to remove an even amount of material all the way around. They make a cloth emory sand paper on a thin ribbon roll in the paint sections of parts stores that works great.
 

Last edited by aim4squirrels; Jul 13, 2012 at 10:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 12:11 AM
  #33  
gdstock's Avatar
gdstock
Legend
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by billcart
Hijacking here but I was wondering if anyone has done this chain set:

http://www.hughesengines.com/Index/p...1&partid=23310
Originally Posted by HeyYou
There are less expensive alternatives... Cloyes, Comp Cams, etc. Check on Jegs, and Summit. Also, don't forget to check with your local parts stores as well.

Not only are there less expensive alternatives, THAT ONE is still a Morse chain. Technically, Morse Chains are stronger. More small pieces, kind of laminating effect. But they wear faster as well, allowing for slack. As the cam is not a heavy load to turn, Morse is not the best alternative. Additiaonlly, Morse chains were origianlly designed for lower rpm applications.
 

Last edited by gdstock; Jul 15, 2012 at 12:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 11:59 PM
  #34  
MeanMagnum99's Avatar
MeanMagnum99
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
You should be fine with the stock cam's specs. No trensioner should be necessary with the JP chain. Just be sure you don't force the gear on the crank snout, test fit the gears without the chain first, sand it out a bit if necessary, and do the best you can to remove an even amount of material all the way around. They make a cloth emory sand paper on a thin ribbon roll in the paint sections of parts stores that works great.
Great info. I picked up some emery ribbon today to sand the sprocket out some. I went ahead and ordered all the gaskets and everything needed to do this project.
I also ordered a new water pump from GMB and a 180° thermostat. Are these water pumps any good? I have an efan conversion on my truck already so bearing stress shouldn't be an issue.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2012 | 12:22 AM
  #35  
gdstock's Avatar
gdstock
Legend
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Since PCM is looking for 190 deg, the 180 may cause some side effects. Using an SCT tune will eliminate the problem and allow the 180 stat to work.
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #36  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

180° t stats typically work on these engine without throwing a CEL, but not always. You'll have to try it and see. Definitely don't bother with colder. Years ago Stant made a really good stat called a superstat, I don't know if they are still held in high regard.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #37  
MeanMagnum99's Avatar
MeanMagnum99
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
180° t stats typically work on these engine without throwing a CEL, but not always. You'll have to try it and see. Definitely don't bother with colder. Years ago Stant made a really good stat called a superstat, I don't know if they are still held in high regard.


Actually I just bought the 180° Stant Superstat from Advance Auto Parts on Saturday. So you're saying don't use the colder thermostat?
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2012 | 09:11 PM
  #38  
aim4squirrels's Avatar
aim4squirrels
Legend
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,843
Likes: 13
From: DFW, Texas
Default

180° should be fine, don't go colder. Stant should still be a good brand, unless others chime in stating it no longer is.

Brand quality on small parts seems to change quickly these days, I've been out of the 2nd gen truck game for a little bit now to keep up with the changes.
 

Last edited by aim4squirrels; Jul 16, 2012 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2012 | 11:34 PM
  #39  
gdstock's Avatar
gdstock
Legend
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by aim4squirrels
180° should be fine, don't go colder. Stant should still be a good brand, unless others chime in stating it no longer is.

Brand quality on small parts seems to change quickly these days, I've been out of the 2nd gen truck game for a little bit now to keep up with the changes.

You need to get another 2nd gen. You know you miss it!
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 01:48 AM
  #40  
MeanMagnum99's Avatar
MeanMagnum99
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Well I just want to thank everyone for all the great advice and sharing their know-how from experience. I will be tackling this project as soon as my all my parts come in. I will have some free time since I'm on paternity leave. We just had a handsome lil boy a few hours ago. (One proud dad right here!) Thanks again everyone and I will post up my progress as I finish this project.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.