2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Finally after a few years I got to the plenum repleament.

Old Dec 20, 2017 | 10:53 PM
  #1  
BigRedRam95's Avatar
BigRedRam95
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 2
From: WV
Default Finally after a few years I got to the plenum repleament.

I'm in the process of swapping intake manifolds and doing the plenum gasket. Got the intake off tonight. I did end up breaking the oil pressure sending unit so I need to replace that. One thing I was going to ask I have had a very slow coolant leak since I got the truck with 67000 miles on it. Over maybe 4 weeks the over flow bottle would be empty. But it never drips coolant on the ground. I'm leaning toward it being the timing cover gasket. So while I have the front of engine off what else would be smart to change? Truck has 100000 miles on it. I was thinking water pump, timing chain , new gasket, bypass hose. Also someone has said something about a front crank seal as well. Any and all info will be appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2017 | 01:33 AM
  #2  
chevelle68's Avatar
chevelle68
Rookie
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

i have a very subtle coolant loss like you are describing. it could very well be timing cover gasket. i am at 165k miles and never had any noticeable leaks so i am guessing that some coolant is evaporating internally somehow, perhaps due to cracked heads but really don't know. truck runs good, no leaks at all, so i really don't worry about it and just make sure to add coolant to the reservoir. similar to just making sure engine oil is good to go. i did install a plenum kit so i am burning normal oil instead of crazy amounts due to plenum.

if you are already there it would be a good idea to do injector seals, water pump, timing chain, the gasket for timing chain cover, bypass hose, water neck housing, and thermostat. i did not do it at all at once, had to re-visit that area three times to get it all done.

it's pretty good if you only have 100k miles.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2017 | 01:47 AM
  #3  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

Shoot, 100k is nothing. Not even close to worn out. I didn't dig into mine until after 200k. But had the plenum done at 70ish back in the day preemptively.

Coolant evaporates. It will always slowly go down. Unless you see it or smell it, I wouldn't worry about it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2017 | 10:37 PM
  #4  
2bit's Avatar
2bit
Record Breaker
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 35
From: Wisconsin
Default

Dist cap and rotor are easy to change with the intake removed.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2017 | 11:06 PM
  #5  
ksbowman's Avatar
ksbowman
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

I changed mine at 160,000, I now have 265,000 on a 5.9 gas. Raised cane with the dealer I bought the plenum kit from and told them it was bad engineering have 2 different metals with different expansion and contraction rates and asked if Dodge would supply the kit non-gratis. He said I was correct about the cause and a service bulletin was issued on it. The problem was it wasn't a safety issue therefore no recall was issued. The government only requires a recall for safety not bad product engineering. Whole job only took about 4 hours, so at least it was easy.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 10:12 AM
  #6  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,482
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by ksbowman
I changed mine at 160,000, I now have 265,000 on a 5.9 gas. Raised cane with the dealer I bought the plenum kit from and told them it was bad engineering have 2 different metals with different expansion and contraction rates and asked if Dodge would supply the kit non-gratis. He said I was correct about the cause and a service bulletin was issued on it. The problem was it wasn't a safety issue therefore no recall was issued. The government only requires a recall for safety not bad product engineering. Whole job only took about 4 hours, so at least it was easy.
It wasn't dissimilar metals that caused the problems. The difference in expansion rates is measured in thousandths of an inch. (and single digit at that.) The problem was poor quality gaskets, and bolts there were too long.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 10:35 AM
  #7  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

You're both wrong.

It was terrorism! haha
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,482
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Ramman18
You're both wrong.

It was terrorism! haha
No, NO! It was a communist PLOT!!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
Ramman18's Avatar
Ramman18
Champion
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,103
Likes: 109
From:
Default

Well, it was right around the end of the cold war that these trucks were designed so maybe the Russians hacked Chrysler and changed the spec sheet!
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2017 | 11:03 AM
  #10  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,482
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Nah, it's gotta be Trumps fault.... he was colluding with the Russians after all.....
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.