2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2 performance build

Old Jun 3, 2018 | 12:44 PM
  #1  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default 5.2 performance build

Hey all, I知 going to shoot for the stars on a budget 318 track build. I知 looking for some ideas for heads, cam, intake and anything else to help build hp and win races. Doing have to be a 10 second truck, I知 not going to drag races. I知 a road course guy.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 12:47 PM
  #2  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,393
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

It's a truck....... I don't think 'road course' enters into it anywhere.... You are well over 5000 pounds to start with.....

Think I would start with a 360 though. Dollar for dollar, you will end up with more horsepower in the end.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 01:29 PM
  #3  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
It's a truck....... I don't think 'road course' enters into it anywhere.... You are well over 5000 pounds to start with.....

Think I would start with a 360 though. Dollar for dollar, you will end up with more horsepower in the end.

Well, I posted in the ram forum for the main reason of more 5.2s are in rams. I壇 be building a 5.2 for a Dakota. Figure more people would build up a 5.2 when they already have one. More 360 swapped dakotas and I want to to prove people wrong, I could just send the motor to the speed shop down the road.... rather not though...
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 02:24 PM
  #4  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,393
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

So, less weight, but, same still applies. Dollar for dollar, you get more from the 360. There is no 'proving' anything here, it already HAS been proven. Sure, you can build a stout 318, but, the exact same parts on the 360 WILL get you more power.

Question becomes, where do you want your power band?
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 04:56 PM
  #5  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
So, less weight, but, same still applies. Dollar for dollar, you get more from the 360. There is no 'proving' anything here, it already HAS been proven. Sure, you can build a stout 318, but, the exact same parts on the 360 WILL get you more power.

Question becomes, where do you want your power band?
Well if it痴 going to be a course truck it値l need to be versatile, mid to high rpm would probably be best but I知 sure there痴 other recommendations. Plus it would be nice if it were streetable still, drive it to the track and home ya know.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2018 | 02:51 AM
  #6  
MoparFanatic21's Avatar
MoparFanatic21
Legend
Veteran: Marine Corps
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 8,098
Likes: 318
Default

Originally Posted by Jmikk


Well if it痴 going to be a course truck it値l need to be versatile, mid to high rpm would probably be best but I知 sure there痴 other recommendations. Plus it would be nice if it were streetable still, drive it to the track and home ya know.
What's your definition of "streetable?" I had a streetable 69 Coronet with a 440 it literally took a gallon of gas to go one city block
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2018 | 07:29 AM
  #7  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MoparFanatic21
What's your definition of "streetable?" I had a streetable 69 Coronet with a 440 it literally took a gallon of gas to go one city block
I mean I can make a turn without blowing it sideways, it痴 not impossible to drive on the state roads
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2018 | 09:28 AM
  #8  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
So, less weight, but, same still applies. Dollar for dollar, you get more from the 360. There is no 'proving' anything here, it already HAS been proven. Sure, you can build a stout 318, but, the exact same parts on the 360 WILL get you more power.

Question becomes, where do you want your power band?
So, do you think a stock 5.9 bottom end handle 8 psi from a Procharger... thinking of going boosted
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2018 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,393
Likes: 4,213
From: Clayton MI
Default

Originally Posted by Jmikk
So, do you think a stock 5.9 bottom end handle 8 psi from a Procharger... thinking of going boosted
If it's in good shape, yup. NOTHING wakes up a motor like forced induction.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2018 | 10:02 AM
  #10  
Jmikk's Avatar
Jmikk
Thread Starter
|
Professional
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
If it's in good shape, yup. NOTHING wakes up a motor like forced induction.
okay, was looking into it and wondered if I should bite it and get a scat crank lol
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM.