3rd Gen Dakota general discussion This section is for general discussions about your 3rd gen Dakota. Non tech related Dakota threads belong here.

Interesting Dakota sales graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #1  
Eimer123's Avatar
Eimer123
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 2
From: Noblesville Indiana
Default Interesting Dakota sales graph

dakotagraph.jpg
 

Last edited by Eimer123; Jan 9, 2011 at 11:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 11:23 PM
  #2  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,204
Likes: 363
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

where?
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 11:38 PM
  #3  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

I click on it and get stolen.gif?
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 11:43 PM
  #4  
Eimer123's Avatar
Eimer123
Thread Starter
|
Record Breaker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 2
From: Noblesville Indiana
Default

Ahh stupid website security... give me a minute I know how to get around that lol.


Fixed lol
 

Last edited by Eimer123; Jan 9, 2011 at 11:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 11:51 PM
  #5  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

Wow that is a sharp drop. If there was an RT Dakota with a 5.7L and an SRT8 Dakota with a 6.1 that graph would be maxed out.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Looks like my first two years of college:
First semester - Ok
Second semester - Better
Third semester - Awesome
Fourth semster - S*i*t*y
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 12:54 AM
  #7  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

Yeah man, kind of makes me
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:18 AM
  #8  
User's Avatar
User
Champion
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke, Texas
Default

2nd gen FTW~
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:23 AM
  #9  
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

You can tell the best years were with new features. 1997 featured a new body style, which IMO, was the best thing that happened to the Dakota. It gave it that sporty look. In 2001-2002 you had the 4.7l that came out along with the 545rfe transmission, and you also had the introduction of quad cabs. In the couple years before that you had the R/T Dakotas with 5.9l engines. Im actually suprised to see the 2005 sales so high; its actually not too bad compared to the other years although it is lower. But after that is just pitiful. Not even the new 4.7l could save the Dakota in 2008 .... MAYBE THEY SHOULDVE HAD A COMMERCIAL FOR IT. Advertising is key for vehicals.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 01:24 AM
  #10  
Q-TIP's Avatar
Q-TIP
Professional
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Default

Engine choice and trim level would have no recognizable impact on that sales graph. The Dakota's sales are tanking because the Tacoma is a nicer truck and you can get a Ram 1500 for a few grand more. Not only that but Chrysler's sales have been tailing off across the board due to poor publicity and uninteresting vehicles.

I love my 2009 but I only bought it because the dealer was willing to take $14,000 off the sticker price to unload it. I use it for work and in a few more months when I have paid it off I will be moving on to a more refined machine.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 AM.