3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

2006 4.7 HO HP vs 2009 4.7 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
hwcurtice's Avatar
hwcurtice
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 353
Likes: 1
From: Sultan, WA
Default 2006 4.7 HO HP vs 2009 4.7 HP

So I ran the numbers last night, just because I had two different people tell me two different things and found out after all the BS that the difference between the two engines is about 17 HP at the same rpm.

My 4.7 HO has a 260 HP @ 5200 RPM, while the newer 4.7, (not a HO) they show a 302 @ 5650 RPM. But when you do some math, the new 4.7 has 277 HP @ 5200 rpm.

So whats the big deal? Well, the thought has come to mind to get a full size Ram 1500, but I'm not really happy with the towing of my 4.7, so I figured I'd get the 5.7 Hemi. One guy said the new 4.7 has much more HP, well, when you compare apples to apples, 17 isn't that much.

Am I reading this wrong?
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #2  
HammerZ71's Avatar
HammerZ71
Administrator
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 21
From: South Georgia/East Florida
Default

That's probably about right. I have a Grand Cherokee with the 4.7 HO and have driven a couple newer ones with the 4.7. IMO the HO makes better power/torque down lower in the rpm band, but the newer designed 4.7 revs out higher or makes better power in the mid/upper rpm band. I've never really looked at dynos for either, but that's my "butt dyno" perception, anyway.

However, if you are looking at a full size Ram, get a Hemi. Better power, better torque for towing and it gets at least the same fuel economy of the smaller 4.7 if not even a tad better...
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 08:35 PM
  #3  
Pwall's Avatar
Pwall
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: south florida
Default

the 4.7 in a dakota has more useable power then the ram 4.7 due to the weight difference in the trucks. the power might be the same but you have to to take the trucks weight into account
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #4  
Blown287's Avatar
Blown287
Grand Champion
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 3
From: Kekaha, HI
Default

The best dyno I've seen on a 08 4.7l is 247 rwhp. All I know is that it the best Superchips has gotten out of a 08 Ram 4.7L is 247 rwhp. Thats not bad considering that is what an 04 Hemi Ram puts down stock. The average has been been around 220 rwhp which is low for a motor rated at 315 crank.
https://dodgeforum.com/forum/3rd-gen...numbers-5.html

If you want a powerful HO 4.7L with good gas mileage, run boost. Find a good blower or turbo setup and get better gas mileage and more power than a Hemi.
If you want great aftermarket support in a bigger engine, do a Hemi Swap.
If you want a Hemi without doing a swap, buy a Ram.

I still think Hemifever could get some great numbers out of the new 08 4.7L in one of our trucks (05-07) with an SCT tune.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 02:30 AM
  #5  
gjmoran's Avatar
gjmoran
Captain
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Default

Originally Posted by Pwall
the 4.7 in a dakota has more useable power then the ram 4.7 due to the weight difference in the trucks. the power might be the same but you have to to take the trucks weight into account
i thought the weight difference between a ram and a dakota is only 300 or so lbs? or did i hear incorrectly.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 08:38 AM
  #6  
donkeypunch's Avatar
donkeypunch
King Jackass
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 5
From: Aurora, CO
Default

Well, horsepower comparisons are kind of stupid. Yes, at certain rpms, one engine might make "almost" as much power as a different engine. Yet, at a different rpm, the lower HP engine doesn't come close to making that kind of power. So, the comparison of the old and new 4.7L HP isn't fair unless you compare them at their highest HP rpms. For instance, the new 4.7L makes peak power at 5650 rpms. So, how much power does the old 4.7L make at 5650? Dyno graphs are what tell the tale of usable power, not just HP ratings.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by gjmoran
i thought the weight difference between a ram and a dakota is only 300 or so lbs? or did i hear incorrectly.
That is what I have read when comparing the 03 Ram 4.7l Quad Cab to the 05 Dakota 4.7l Quad Cab. There is less than 400lbs difference in weight; but the Dakota is supposed to compete with the half ton truck market. Regardless, the new Dakota is a very heavy truck.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #8  
jkeaton's Avatar
jkeaton
DF Admin
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 28,205
Likes: 363
From: Winston Salem, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rengnath
That is what I have read when comparing the 03 Ram 4.7l Quad Cab to the 05 Dakota 4.7l Quad Cab. There is less than 400lbs difference in weight; but the Dakota is supposed to compete with the half ton truck market. Regardless, the new Dakota is a very heavy truck.
thats part of what doomed the Dakota imo, they marketed it directly against the Ram.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 09:46 PM
  #9  
Pwall's Avatar
Pwall
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: south florida
Default

well i stand corrected
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:05 PM
  #10  
rengnath's Avatar
rengnath
Champion
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Pwall
well i stand corrected
Technically the Dakota have a better HP:weight ratio. Just not much So you were right in your statement.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.