what gears are right for me
#3
What are you trying to achieve? Highway mileage will suffer with shorter gears (4.10, 4.56, etc). City mileage may suffer with taller gears (3.55, 3.21, etc).
It sounds like you're trying to improve low-end grunt, so 4.10s or 4.56s should help. That's a pretty short tire, so your effective rear-end ratio is already short, as well.
It sounds like you're trying to improve low-end grunt, so 4.10s or 4.56s should help. That's a pretty short tire, so your effective rear-end ratio is already short, as well.
#4
What gear are you currently running?
With tires that are only 30 inches tall or so, id go with a 4.10 or 4.56. 4.88's are way too low, unless you don't do any highway driving.
If you have 3.92 stock, you won't notice much of a difference to a 4.10 or even a 4.56 jump, and hard to justify the cost.
If you have a 3.55 stock (like I did) then its well worth the cost to jump to a 4.56.
My rpm only jumped from about 1550-1600 to 1950-2000 at 60 mph, and have only seen gains as far as MPG are concerned, but I've got 32" tires.
with our .67 overdrive gear and 30"+ tires, a higher numerical gear ratio like 4.56 will not kill highway gas mileage. It usually stays the same, and improves 1-3mpg in town.
With tires that are only 30 inches tall or so, id go with a 4.10 or 4.56. 4.88's are way too low, unless you don't do any highway driving.
If you have 3.92 stock, you won't notice much of a difference to a 4.10 or even a 4.56 jump, and hard to justify the cost.
If you have a 3.55 stock (like I did) then its well worth the cost to jump to a 4.56.
My rpm only jumped from about 1550-1600 to 1950-2000 at 60 mph, and have only seen gains as far as MPG are concerned, but I've got 32" tires.
with our .67 overdrive gear and 30"+ tires, a higher numerical gear ratio like 4.56 will not kill highway gas mileage. It usually stays the same, and improves 1-3mpg in town.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Georgia/East Florida
Posts: 24,686
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
19 Posts
Trending Topics
#8