Dodge Challenger Forum for the 2008+ Challenger. This includes the SE, SXT, R/T, Shaker, Scat Pack, SRT and Hellcat models.

New Challenger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #101  
shiltz's Avatar
shiltz
Captain
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Challenger?

who care what it weighs if it has the perfomance, dodge's estimated perfomance acording to car and driver is 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.0 seconds, and dodge always lowballs perfomance numbers, the 300/magnum/charger with the 5.7 acording to dodge does 0-60 in 6.3 seconds, but in actuality they normaly do it in 5.8-6.1, so I would expect 0-60 in low 4's and the 1/4 mile in the high 12's
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #102  
Challenger Lover's Avatar
Challenger Lover
Record Breaker
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
From: Quebec Canada
Default RE: New Challenger?

CHALLENGER ALL THE WAY !


ya it looks really good !

 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #103  
dodgebrothers's Avatar
dodgebrothers
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Challenger?

If they put the 6.1 in it and the pistol grip & 6 speed, I don't care the size or weight. Heck, they have to use as much of their existing platform to make it work economically. Let's not lose sight of the larger picture here. If they can't get enthusiasm on this site (and yes, you can bet some brand mgrs watch this site), where will they find it???

I also love the apparent "butterfly" opennings for the hood scoop. Hell, that's an improvement over the original!!

Can't wait to see it at the Cleveland Autoshow
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #104  
MGDMike's Avatar
MGDMike
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Stewart, GA
Default RE: New Challenger?

Lets swamp them with emails saying we want this in production!!!

Click here to email:
http://www-5.dodge.com/wccsapp/unive...ull&category=N
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #105  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: New Challenger?

Weight has a profound effect on performance in every possible way, everything from 0-60 and 1/4 mile times to top speed, handling and braking. Lots of people love to rag on the old musclecars and how poorly they handled and there is no reason to duplicate the musclecars that exactly. If this Challenger weighs in at 4,100 pounds then it will weigh more than most every musclecar and 500 pounds more than the original Challengers. A modern day musclecar should be far more well rounded and balanced.

Dodge has always been one to underrate their power and performance, but Dumler is the exact opposite, just look at the new Viper SRT-10 coupe and it's stats versus it's performance. Now how is it possible that the new Viper, which is supose to have 60 horsepower more than the previous GTS model as well as being the same weight or lighter, lower, wider and better in every way, is actually slower than the GTS. An article in one of the major magazines compared the new Viper, the new Z06 and the Ford GT. The GT had almost the advertised crank horsepower at the wheels and the Viper had by far the biggest lose in power from the advertised rating to the wheels which is why the Viper got burned badly by the competition. This just goes to show the difference between Dodge and Dumler, the Dodge Viper with 450 horsepower stock ran 11.97 in the 1/4 mile and the Dumler Viper with 510 horsepower stock ran 12.2 in the 1/4 mile. The Dodge Viper GTS looked like nothing else and is great looking. The Dumler Viper SRT-10 coupe looks great, but it looks alot like the Corvette now.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #106  
shiltz's Avatar
shiltz
Captain
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Challenger?

yeah, weight can effect the handling, but they can make a heavy car handle just fine, I mean look at the SRT-8 magnum, at almost 4300 pounds it out handles a 3450 pound mustang GT on the skidpad and is only about 1mph behind it on on slalom, heck it's really not even that far behind the Z06 vette on the slalom and skidpad.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #107  
QuickSilver05's Avatar
QuickSilver05
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New Challenger?

Weight is a factor, but not the be all and end all of everything. If the weight is engineered well, it won't negatively effect handling at all.

If they build this car, just like they are showing in the pics, I WILL BUY ONE. Period, end of story. If they diviate very much from the concept shown however, that would be a big dissapointment for me.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #108  
deranged's Avatar
deranged
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 1
Default RE: New Challenger?

Sent my e-mail tuesday, I think, and got a response yesterday from a Renee at The Dodge Information Center thanking me for my feedback on the Challenger concept and support of Chrysler brands. Most interesting was the comment she made that since this vehicle is still in the concept stage that she could not provide any pricing or production data. She also said that my interest in the Challenger HAD BEEN DOCUMENTED and then went on to point out that the Viper, Prowler and PT Cruiser had also been introduced from concepts. Since we are all on here discussing the Challenger anyway, why not just e-mail Dodge about it. The more positive responses they get can only help bring this car to production more quickly! I can feel the Pistol Grip in the palm of my hand right now!
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 05:15 PM
  #109  
MGDMike's Avatar
MGDMike
Champion
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Stewart, GA
Default RE: New Challenger?

Another pic.
Source: http://www.autoblog.com/2005/07/20/d...oit-auto-show/

 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #110  
deranged's Avatar
deranged
Record Breaker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 1
Default RE: New Challenger?

I think the '71 Cuda was the best looking of the bunch.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 PM.