Neon SRT-4 Dodge Neon SRT-4 is the pocket rocket that took the import scene and turned it upside down.

New to the site

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #11  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: New to the site

ORIGINAL: Carnewb

Thanks for the help, on that site you posted showing how to install the catch can, the guy mounted it into his AC line, is that the best place to mount it?
It is simply a location of ease and accessability. If you buy enough hose you can mount it anywhere you would like.

ORIGINAL: posthondaremoval

I hadn't thought about that - but - I noticed when I removed the stock airbox there was a lot of oil in there. also the car has what feels like a slight misfire at idle. don't know if a catch can would help this type of situation(would it?) but I am sure it's real good preventative.
The oil in the air box is from the hose on the drivers side of the valve/cam cover and I also have a second OCC on it and it doesn't get much oil in it, no where near as much as in the one in my PCV line that goes straight into the intake manifold. For the one that goes into the air box, it took a few weeks before any oil showed up in it, but the one for my PCV had a small amount in it on the second day and gets around 1/3 to 1/2 full after about a month or two.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #12  
Carnewb's Avatar
Carnewb
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default RE: New to the site

So how many times do you need to empty the OCC? Or does something else happen to it?
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #13  
dustyloins's Avatar
dustyloins
R.I.P. Dusty (Retired Moderator
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,471
Likes: 0
From: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Default RE: New to the site

You won't have to empty it all that often. It's clear plastic so you can easily see when it's getting full. It will depend on how much you drive and how hard you push it. If you unscrew it to empty it, don't lose the little o-ring......
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 04:55 AM
  #14  
Carnewb's Avatar
Carnewb
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default RE: New to the site

Would you guys rather get the Mopar exhaust, Magnaflow exhaust, ATR Catback exhaust, or the MPx exhaust system?
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #15  
71RoadRunner's Avatar
71RoadRunner
Legend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,543
Likes: 2
From: United States
Default RE: New to the site

It all depends on how much money you have to put into it and how much power you want out of it? I think the MPx is the best, but only if you plan on going over 350 horsepower. If you going to stay under 350 horsepower, then just get the Mopar/Borla exhaust.[sm=smiley2.gif]
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
Napoli's Avatar
Napoli
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New to the site

Hi I too am new to this site so here goes,
I recently sold my 328is BMW and have had my 04-SRT-4 for just over a month, needless to say I have loved every minute of driving the SRT and have not missed my U-boat for one minute!
I was never a fan of the “little hot rod/car†concept however the SRT has made a new believer out of me, and the potential for the car is still not fully explored.
My question is this: What at are the differences in real HP/torque gain between modifications to the intake versus say the headers/exhaust system? I.e. if you look at the K&N intake and take their hp rating to be gospel, it works to be about $66/hp of gain. What would one get for a similar upgrade in the exhaust system?
I have read about the K&N intake and frankly from experience I have always been suspicious of their HP. numbers. I also see that other companies claiming their intakes HP gains even higher than K&N’s (see AEM’s claims).

Regards,

Napoli
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #17  
dustyloins's Avatar
dustyloins
R.I.P. Dusty (Retired Moderator
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,471
Likes: 0
From: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Default RE: New to the site

If you go to www.modernperformance.com, they have a dyno chart on a 2003 SRT-4 before and after putting on a Morpa/Borla exhaust and a CAI with Stage 1, I believe. Remember, the 2003s were only "rated" at 215 HP, stock.....your 2004 is "rated" at 230 HP, stock.....[&:]
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #18  
dustyloins's Avatar
dustyloins
R.I.P. Dusty (Retired Moderator
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,471
Likes: 0
From: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Default RE: New to the site

BTW, Modern Performance is located in Houston, Texas. As we all know, dyno runs on a turbo car can be affected by temp/humidity and tend to be better when the weather is cool and dry. Houston isn't known for cool and dry weather, so dyno figures done somewhere else may be even higher.....[sm=smiley20.gif]
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #19  
Napoli's Avatar
Napoli
Rookie
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: New to the site

Dusty,
Thanks for the quick response,
Houston is the "mother of all humidity" so your right it does not lend itself well to the Turbo powered cars. Not having driven my SRT eleswhere I cannot tell the difference.
I will check the site you mentioned for their numbers,
Thanks again,

Napoli,
Maybe I should change my name to Wet-loins?...lol!
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #20  
dustyloins's Avatar
dustyloins
R.I.P. Dusty (Retired Moderator
Hall of Fame Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,471
Likes: 0
From: Alamosa, Colorado (200 yards from the Rio Grande)
Default RE: New to the site

Either that, or Rustyloins!!!!!![sm=smiley36.gif][sm=smiley36.gif][sm=smiley20.gif]
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.