lifting or tilting the cab questions
For the air cleaner I wanted to use one like this.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MoPAR-Perfor...RX1hZK&vxp=mtr
FWIW we have the 95 and 96 FSM available as a download in the FAQ section. I looked at the transmission R&R process. They have the standard, remove, transfer case, y-pipe, starter, etc, then remove transmission. Never any mention of lifting body etc.
So, I believe its not going to be necessary, or the 95 is made different.
And Ragged, do you remember if you used an 11in, or 12in. clutch?
Thanks
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MoPAR-Perfor...RX1hZK&vxp=mtr
FWIW we have the 95 and 96 FSM available as a download in the FAQ section. I looked at the transmission R&R process. They have the standard, remove, transfer case, y-pipe, starter, etc, then remove transmission. Never any mention of lifting body etc.
So, I believe its not going to be necessary, or the 95 is made different.
And Ragged, do you remember if you used an 11in, or 12in. clutch?
Thanks
For the air cleaner I wanted to use one like this.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MoPAR-Perfor...RX1hZK&vxp=mtr
FWIW we have the 95 and 96 FSM available as a download in the FAQ section. I looked at the transmission R&R process. They have the standard, remove, transfer case, y-pipe, starter, etc, then remove transmission. Never any mention of lifting body etc.
So, I believe its not going to be necessary, or the 95 is made different.
And Ragged, do you remember if you used an 11in, or 12in. clutch?
Thanks
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MoPAR-Perfor...RX1hZK&vxp=mtr
FWIW we have the 95 and 96 FSM available as a download in the FAQ section. I looked at the transmission R&R process. They have the standard, remove, transfer case, y-pipe, starter, etc, then remove transmission. Never any mention of lifting body etc.
So, I believe its not going to be necessary, or the 95 is made different.
And Ragged, do you remember if you used an 11in, or 12in. clutch?
Thanks
Ahh, to each his own. I want it for a clean look. And besides, I will have a holley 670 4bbl. Stock will not fit.
As far as performing less? Ill bet, you would be hard pressed to see 2hp difference between any of them on a stock or near stock motor.
Super Chevy tested a few CAIs on a El Camino (70's vintage).
The first dyno pull was OK; but by the third, HP was down something like 100HP due to how hot the air coming in was (!!!!)
Just keep that in mind.
RwP
Yeah, im sorry, I dont believe that there would be a 100 rwhp loss on a 70's el camino, that the addition of a CAI would correct. There is more to the story then that.
Care to share a link?
Also, please keep in mind we are talking about a 5.2-5.9 200-250 rwhp, (at best)
Other way around; the CAI COST them 100 HP. Albeit, it was a typical "CAI" that sucked air from the engine bay.
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
Other way around; the CAI COST them 100 HP. Albeit, it was a typical "CAI" that sucked air from the engine bay.
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
its the same thing!
Other way around; the CAI COST them 100 HP. Albeit, it was a typical "CAI" that sucked air from the engine bay.
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
This was a built motor; first pull passed 700HP or so IIRC.
I'd love to find the link; I read it in the paper and didn't keep it (drats!)
OTOH, here's a review of several as-installed:
http://dailyderbi.com/cold-air-intakes-dont-work/
(Note: A lot of the magazines show that they work great ... on an engine dyno. Under the hood, on a hot summer day, after a pull or three ... not so good for most of them. And the fact that you quite often end up with LESS filter element on the cone style filter means that the motor has to work a small bit harder to suck in enough air. They do sound good, though.)
RwP
I used to drag race, and under-hood temperature was so important that most of us would push our car thru the que and not start it until just before making a run down the track. We also used cool cans to ice down the fuel, and even packed dry ice around the intake to get a denser intake.
This was a favorite subject of mine for a time. I even designed a system to dump refrigerant from a standard automotive AC system into coils placed in an intake tube. The charge would last long enough for a run down the quarter mile, or wherever you happened to be
Sorry for helping to side track your post 93RT. For all of my yapping I guess what I'm really saying is that most methods of getting seriously cooler air into the engine aren't practical on a street vehicle anyway. I think you'll be perfectly satisfied with the filter unit you've chosen.






