2nd Gen Dakota Tech 1997 - 2004 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 2nd Gen Dakota.

Best free mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #41  
ksJoe's Avatar
ksJoe
Rookie
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

I understand that. But since the e-fan shuts off every time the temp drops below 210, I don't see it helping the fan.

It seems like in warmer weather, it will run very close to 210. When it drops to 209, the fan shuts off, until it warms back up. I'd expect it to stay at 210 +/- a few. Its all well above either thermostat, so they would both stay open the whole time.

When the weather is cold enough that no fan at all is needed, then your 190 vs 180 thermostat would make a real difference. Same thing if you're going fast enough down the highway that no fan is needed - then the thermostat affects engine operating temp.

But I don't see how a 180 thermostat helps the fan keep up. Any time cooling is limited by the fan, the thermostats are performing the same (both open).
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 09:37 PM
  #42  
thunder98110's Avatar
thunder98110
Champion
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 6
From: DC
Default

the only thing the 180tstat does is get a jump start on cooling.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 11:21 PM
  #43  
dodgeramguy85's Avatar
dodgeramguy85
Grand Champion
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 7
From: Houtzdale,PA
Default

Thunder is correct. The fan I dont think shuts off at 209 Im sure it takes it down 10 degrees or so before it shuts off. Your temp constantly goes up or down. You cant tell by looking at the stock gauge since its not detailed. If you had a digital one you would see the increase/decrease in temp.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2011 | 02:50 PM
  #44  
GrnDak01's Avatar
GrnDak01
Rookie
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: St. Ann, MO
Default fan delete

I took the clutch fan off this Sunday and I'm noticing a difference in get up and go. I acutally didn't think it would do much but I've been pleasantly surprised. I'm still a little nervous about idling though. The aux fan did come on once when sitting in the driveway. I would like to put in a electric fan. Has anyone used one of the Hayden controllers? Can't remember and I don't have time to search at the moment. Otherwise I would recommend this to anyone but keep your eye on the temp gauge in town.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #45  
dirtbiker's Avatar
dirtbiker
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GrnDak01
I took the clutch fan off this Sunday and I'm noticing a difference in get up and go. I acutally didn't think it would do much but I've been pleasantly surprised. I'm still a little nervous about idling though. The aux fan did come on once when sitting in the driveway. I would like to put in a electric fan. Has anyone used one of the Hayden controllers? Can't remember and I don't have time to search at the moment. Otherwise I would recommend this to anyone but keep your eye on the temp gauge in town.
Yeah, it is surprising. You probably already have a stock efan, since you have an 01. Unless you don't, there's really no need to add an aftermarket efan.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 01:29 AM
  #46  
macgollabhride's Avatar
macgollabhride
Professional
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Thumbs up


Looks like I'm adding another project to the list.
I can't wait to try this out!
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 02:39 AM
  #47  
magnethead's Avatar
magnethead
Legend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,058
Likes: 183
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dirtbiker
Hmmm that's weird I thought Magnethead's was an 01. But yeah it's strange, because mines an SXT which I thought was the base model. And that's really strange that your 00 has one, 1986jeep. Dodge strikes again... lol
Originally Posted by thunder98110
yeah thats the one. there was another guy on here, magnethead that didnt have a stock efan. and there was a guy with a 5.2 just recently that put an aftermarket one in his b.c he didnt have one. maybe some of the 3.9's had them. i dunno, but either way, it works out.
Originally Posted by jamoka3
so you guys have a e-fan and a mechanical (belt driven) clutch fan on your trucks? I only have a mechanical fan. I got the 3.9L.
I was looking into the removal and install of an aftermarket e-fan and temp controller, now im really wanting to this asap!
Originally Posted by dirtbiker
Well just a little update for you guys... Filled up the tank today and got 11.9 mpg out of my last tank. It works out to be about 12.5 when you factor in the tire size difference. But I guess this is mostly due to the fact that my right foot's been doing a lot of flooring. Once I start driving regular again it should get to at least 13. So yeah the mileage should go up a bit once you take the fan off.
I heard my name?

I didn't think mine had an efan, but it does. But it's kinda disabled since the radiator is shoved into it from a meeting with a stop sign (I would imagine the fuse is blown...I tried turning it with ym hand one day, and it didn't budge, was stuck in the rad fins). But I have the SCT + 180 Tstat in mine running 91 on the 93 tune, and needle stays straight up or less. One day when I have some extra $$$ I'll do the Taurus or HHR fan swap and ditch the mechanical fan. I get 12.5 or so MPG raw without taking in effect of tire size (+10%) and with 4.10 gears. I rarely go on the highway, turns 2500 RPM to go 75, but I did the gear swap for stop-and-go city driving. IF I could keep my foot out of it, I could get 13.5 with ease. Average tank is ~250 miles on 20 gallons. The gears picked me up about 25 miles a tank.

The SCT picked me up from 12.4 (empty tank) to 11.8 (full tank) in the 1/8 mile. So overall a 8/10th gain in the 1/8 mile probably after factoring out fuel weight. I haven't gone back since I put the gears in, I could probably run 11.5's or better and be one of the faster trucks in street (bracket racing).

I still have the hardland sharp rockers on my desk that I need to put on.
 

Last edited by magnethead; Dec 21, 2011 at 03:14 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #48  
DakinUK's Avatar
DakinUK
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 4
From:
Smile

Sorry to jack this thread but I'm about to fit some 4.10's to my 4.7.

I'm interested to hear that your gas mileage has improved (if I've understood correctly!). I've worked out that the motor will only be turning 300rpm more at 70mph but will be under less load. It will also be running closer to its peak torque/efficiency revs.

I'm looking forward to the results even more now!
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2011 | 12:30 PM
  #49  
dirtbiker's Avatar
dirtbiker
Thread Starter
|
Captain
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DakinUK
Sorry to jack this thread but I'm about to fit some 4.10's to my 4.7.

I'm interested to hear that your gas mileage has improved (if I've understood correctly!). I've worked out that the motor will only be turning 300rpm more at 70mph but will be under less load. It will also be running closer to its peak torque/efficiency revs.

I'm looking forward to the results even more now!
Gas mileage is a little hard to track right now, because I'm driving pretty inconsistently on city/highways. Plus it's (almost) winter. It should be a slight improvement come summer though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #50  
LuggNutt's Avatar
LuggNutt
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

2003 3.9 v6 - Had my clutch fan off all summer long with no probs at all. Not needed.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.