2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

360 vs V10???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-26-2012, 06:05 PM
Nsmitty21's Avatar
Nsmitty21
Nsmitty21 is offline
Professional
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 360 vs V10???

I have an opportunity to possible get a hold of a nice 1998 Ram 2500 V10 and currently have a 360 V8. Right now I feel like my truck gets terrible mileage and I do haul wood from time to time so a 3/4 would be nice. What are the pros and cons of possibly trading up to a V10???
 
  #2  
Old 12-26-2012, 06:09 PM
dlyter09's Avatar
dlyter09
dlyter09 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Harrisburg,PA
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its a hell of a motor.. Not alot in the aftermarket for it though.. It will do what you want and wont complain like the v8... Gas mileage will be about the same or a little less than the v8
 
  #3  
Old 12-26-2012, 06:36 PM
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
aofarrell2 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

15 is the average MPG for a tuned-up V10. More torque, more HP. All I can say. Just the 8 cyl with 2 more tacked on.
 
  #4  
Old 12-26-2012, 06:40 PM
stewie01's Avatar
stewie01
stewie01 is offline
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by techningeer
15 is the average MPG for a tuned-up V10. More torque, more HP. All I can say. Just the 8 cyl with 2 more tacked on.
He wouldn't have to worry about the plenum problem
 
  #5  
Old 12-26-2012, 06:46 PM
aofarrell2's Avatar
aofarrell2
aofarrell2 is offline
Champion
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And no dizzy either.
 
  #6  
Old 12-26-2012, 10:09 PM
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
HeyYou is online now
Administrator
Dodge Forum Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Clayton MI
Posts: 81,017
Likes: 0
Received 3,211 Likes on 2,962 Posts
Default

Not to mention the 47RE seems to be a much stouter trans....
 
  #7  
Old 12-26-2012, 10:35 PM
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Wombat Ranger is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wild West
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

15 mpg's out of a v10? Must be an unloaded 5spd 2wd reg cab steady at 55 on the freeway.


I have never heard of a v10 getting that kind of fuel economy.
 
  #8  
Old 12-26-2012, 11:55 PM
Bob5151's Avatar
Bob5151
Bob5151 is offline
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wombat Ranger
15 mpg's out of a v10? Must be an unloaded 5spd 2wd reg cab steady at 55 on the freeway.


I have never heard of a v10 getting that kind of fuel economy.
From what I've read (mostly on this forum), 9-12 mpg seems to be the norm, depending on the truck's configuration, tire size, ect.
 
  #9  
Old 12-27-2012, 02:31 AM
Wombat Ranger's Avatar
Wombat Ranger
Wombat Ranger is offline
Grand Champion
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wild West
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That's what dad's got, with the worst possible combo for mpg's (qc/lb 4x4 auto v10).

Ball of giggles to drive though.
 
  #10  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:37 AM
Jimythefan's Avatar
Jimythefan
Jimythefan is offline
All Star
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milford NH
Posts: 751
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob5151
From what I've read (mostly on this forum), 9-12 mpg seems to be the norm, depending on the truck's configuration, tire size, ect.
Yup, that sounds about right. I did a best of 13.7 but 9-12 is about right for mine.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.