2nd Gen Ram Tech 1994-2001 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 1994 through 2001 Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

5.2 to 5.9, with an auto to manual Swap to boot.

Old Jan 24, 2015 | 06:20 AM
  #81  
beeker's Avatar
beeker
Captain
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 625
Likes: 5
From: Bremerton, WA
Default

Originally Posted by dean98ram1500
I'm sorry I meant to add that he said with 2.02, 1 piece valves, stronger springs would be $880.00 shipped to the door.
Nice, good they weren't more. Don't forget new head bolts. The ARPs are nice but it's another $100. All these little things add up quick.

Originally Posted by 1997JollyGreenGiant
Thanks for the shoutout Beeker!!! I actually sold the heads a week or 2 ago to a guy with a 2wd rc/sb Dakota. He's building an engine up for it and wasn't concerned about the damage. The damage from that valve was why I was selling them so cheap. Like Beeker said, they had work done to them and the machinist had checked them out.
You're welcome. Glad you were able to place them in a good home
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 03:52 PM
  #82  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by 1997JollyGreenGiant
Thanks for the shoutout Beeker!!! I actually sold the heads a week or 2 ago to a guy with a 2wd rc/sb Dakota. He's building an engine up for it and wasn't concerned about the damage. The damage from that valve was why I was selling them so cheap. Like Beeker said, they had work done to them and the machinist had checked them out.

Dean98ram1500, I still have the camshaft that's perfect for Beeker's springs, you can PM me an offer if you like. It's the Hughe's HER0814AL and I'd give you a good price. I've also got some High Performance roller lifters, but I might want to hold onto those myself
I appreciate the offer very much, trust me, and I kinda do want that cam, but I already have my order placed for my other cam. Thank you, but hmm, I'm a little interested in the roller lifters, I don't know much performance benefit of them, or how they are classified but I was told they could do me some good.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 03:53 PM
  #83  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Wh1t3NuKle
I'm planning on purchasing the hughes engine Air-Gap Intake, I think that will be best suited for my application.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 03:54 PM
  #84  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by beeker
Nice, good they weren't more. Don't forget new head bolts. The ARPs are nice but it's another $100. All these little things add up quick.



You're welcome. Glad you were able to place them in a good home
I'm not disagreeing with you about head bolts, but why should I upgrade? I'm more so uninformed about the upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 04:13 PM
  #85  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Your engine already has roller lifters, so there isn't any performance benefit from buying new ones, but, installing new ones sure gives a lot more peace of mind than re-installing the 100K plus mile lifters.

Air Gap is a good manifold, but, keep in mind, it was originally a carb manifold, adapted to EFI. The M1, which runs about the same price, (and, if you are determined, can find them even cheaper......) was specifically designed for EFI motors, and actually flows better than the Hughes manifold as well. (not to mention its a slightly easier install, no messing with the crossover tube at the rear of the fuel rails.)
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 07:38 PM
  #86  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Your engine already has roller lifters, so there isn't any performance benefit from buying new ones, but, installing new ones sure gives a lot more peace of mind than re-installing the 100K plus mile lifters.

Air Gap is a good manifold, but, keep in mind, it was originally a carb manifold, adapted to EFI. The M1, which runs about the same price, (and, if you are determined, can find them even cheaper......) was specifically designed for EFI motors, and actually flows better than the Hughes manifold as well. (not to mention its a slightly easier install, no messing with the crossover tube at the rear of the fuel rails.)
Ohhh I gotcha. Actually, these lifters have about 4,000 miles on them. The 5.9 I bought has 4k miles on it.

But oh I didn't know that. I might have to kick the airgap to the curb then.
I hate asking such a generic question, but with my build will I have more power? I always thought the M1 to be more of a low end manifold and the AirGap a high end.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 08:14 PM
  #87  
Wh1t3NuKle's Avatar
Wh1t3NuKle
Champion
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,891
Likes: 8
From: NorCal
Default

Guess you didnt click the link in the post where I asked about the intake.

That is what Hey You is talking to. Get educated on your package.

What are you building for anyway? Street, strip, heavy duty, ?
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 09:02 PM
  #88  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by Wh1t3NuKle
Guess you didnt click the link in the post where I asked about the intake.

That is what Hey You is talking to. Get educated on your package.

What are you building for anyway? Street, strip, heavy duty, ?
I didn't even realize that was a link. I'm suprised the Hughes is flowing so little CFM. Makes me rethink my choice on the Airgap.

Building a street application.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 09:50 PM
  #89  
HeyYou's Avatar
HeyYou
Administrator
Veteran: Air Force
Community Favorite
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 87,479
Likes: 4,223
From: Clayton MI
Default

Given that your truck is 4x4, and by the looks of your sig pic, you actually take it off road..... You want low-end grunt. The M1 actually IS more designed for upper RPM power, FAR more so than the kegger..... and yes, if that was the ONLY change you made, you would lose some low end. BUT, as you are doing 'other stuff' as well, you will end up with more low-power than what you have now..... PLUS, you will have decent power up thru the mid range, and possibly in the upper RPM range to some extent as well.

When you step on the go-pedal, you WILL notice a difference.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 10:11 PM
  #90  
dean98ram1500's Avatar
dean98ram1500
Thread Starter
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 1
From: Coram, New York
Default

Originally Posted by HeyYou
Given that your truck is 4x4, and by the looks of your sig pic, you actually take it off road..... You want low-end grunt. The M1 actually IS more designed for upper RPM power, FAR more so than the kegger..... and yes, if that was the ONLY change you made, you would lose some low end. BUT, as you are doing 'other stuff' as well, you will end up with more low-power than what you have now..... PLUS, you will have decent power up thru the mid range, and possibly in the upper RPM range to some extent as well.

When you step on the go-pedal, you WILL notice a difference.
Yeah the occasional Class 6 road here and there. She's not afraid to get a little dirty. I read that entire forum, WN had posted up before. I think I'm sold on that M1. I think with some EQ 2.02 heads, cam, exhaust and others, this will be additive to the whole set-up.

I do like to have low-end, on the occasional boat tow or especially when cruising on the highway.

The only part of that thread I was lost about is when they talked about EGR. I don't really understand that. I know its a Exhaust Gas Recirculation, but not sure if I will require it or not. Pretty significant price difference between the EGR and Non-EGR.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.