3rd Gen Dakota 2005 - 2011 Dodge Dakota Tech - The ultimate forum for technical help on the 3rd Gen Dakota.

Colorado pickup for 2009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:15 PM
baracis's Avatar
baracis
baracis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With the money/talent some of you have, you could easily transform the colorado into whatever you wanted. It seems like a smart move for someone looking to make a "go-fast" with lots of aftermarket parts.
 
  #52  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:16 PM
baracis's Avatar
baracis
baracis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cramerica
A Hemi Dakota would eat one of these for lunch
I want a diesel in mine.
 
  #53  
Old 04-22-2009, 08:25 AM
Racinartist's Avatar
Racinartist
Racinartist is offline
All Star
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dirty Jerzey
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BAdassR/T
i thought u were saying that the Colorado was light..... bc there not.. my bad if i misunderstood you......
Actually, I was. When compared to a Dakota anyway. A quad cab 4WD Dakota weighs in around the 4700-4800 range depending on equipment. And a 'comparable' Colorado/Canyon is 600-700 lighter at around 4100lbs. If the GM trucks had a 300HP V8 like the discussion in this thread suggests, they would still be 500+lbs lighter with the same power. That sounds to me like it would make a Dakota it's little b!tch. And probably make it like it too. :/
 
  #54  
Old 04-22-2009, 05:13 PM
BAdassR/T's Avatar
BAdassR/T
BAdassR/T is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Racinartist
Actually, I was. When compared to a Dakota anyway. A quad cab 4WD Dakota weighs in around the 4700-4800 range depending on equipment. And a 'comparable' Colorado/Canyon is 600-700 lighter at around 4100lbs. If the GM trucks had a 300HP V8 like the discussion in this thread suggests, they would still be 500+lbs lighter with the same power. That sounds to me like it would make a Dakota it's little b!tch. And probably make it like it too. :/
thats where your wrong.. go look up the specs.. the truck weighs just as much as the dakota with a 5 cylinder.. let alone the 8... get ur facts straight..
and they do make a 5.3 colorado quad cab but it weighs in at around 5k ....
 
  #55  
Old 04-22-2009, 05:51 PM
Altair's Avatar
Altair
Altair is offline
Dak attack!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Turn down the heat please
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BAdassR/T
thats where your wrong.. go look up the specs.. the truck weighs just as much as the dakota with a 5 cylinder.. let alone the 8... get ur facts straight..
and they do make a 5.3 colorado quad cab but it weighs in at around 5k ....
I'm not sure where you're finding specs but motortrend ( http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ook/index.html ) as well as a few other sites list the curb weight at 3366-4218 lbs for the '09. Given that the V8 is only available in a Crew Cab 4wd that I can find at the moment that would put it right at the top of that range.
 
  #56  
Old 04-22-2009, 05:51 PM
baracis's Avatar
baracis
baracis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2009 Chevrolet Colorado; Crew Cab I-4 2WD:
curb weight (lbs) 3721.4

Couldn't find anything for the V8...but I can't imagine 4 more cylinders adding 1300 lbs

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2009/...sons/trim.html


And yes you can get the 5.3 in 2wd. If you follow the link you can find out for yourself. What might be throwing people off is the picture says is a 4x4 5.3...maybe making some people think it can only be made in 4x4. I just called the chevy dealership and they confirmed.

http://prod3.gmautobuilder.com/Build...lname=Colorado
 

Last edited by baracis; 04-22-2009 at 05:58 PM.
  #57  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:03 PM
cramerica's Avatar
cramerica
cramerica is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central NY
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can't get the V8 with a regular cab. Your only choice is the extended cab.
 
  #58  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:05 PM
baracis's Avatar
baracis
baracis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Their extended cab is the crew cab. The numbers I posted are right.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2009/...sons/trim.html
 
  #59  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:10 PM
baracis's Avatar
baracis
baracis is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You lose roughly 18% of your stock horsepower through your drivetrain giving us roughly 197 hp at the wheels on a stock 2006 dokota. There hp is roughly 250 at the wheels. Estimating that our truck weighs 4700 pounds and the colorado weighs roughly 4000 pounds (300 added on for 4 more cylinders) the quarter mile times would approximately be:

Dakota: 16.769
Colorado: 14.678

So yea, it kicks the dakotas ***.
 
  #60  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:34 PM
BAdassR/T's Avatar
BAdassR/T
BAdassR/T is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow my bad to racinartist last time i checked the chevy site the numbers were at 5k for the v8 extended..... w/e it really doesnt matter....
 


Quick Reply: Colorado pickup for 2009



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 PM.