3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

CST 4" or Rough Country 6"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:38 PM
SurfnSocal's Avatar
SurfnSocal
SurfnSocal is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default CST 4" or Rough Country 6"?

Hey Everyone,

I'm new to the board. I searched the sticky's and the forum, and couldn't come up with a good answer.

I have a 2005 Ram 1500 QC 2WD Daytona (wing and graphics removed). Had it for the last 2 years and it has 55k miles on it. It's my daily driver but I'm starting to go out to the desert a little and would like to do some light offroading.

I purchased a set of Dick Cepek 17" rims with 285/70/17 tires. Figured out I need to do a minimum 3" lift per Dick Cepek's site.

After searching around, I have settled on:

CST 4" spindle lift
Rough Country 6" lift w/ nitro 9000 shocks.

I can get both shipped for the same the same price.

My question is-

which type of lift puts less stress on the suspension components and how about ride quality?

Also, most of the pics I see of 4-6" lifts have 35" tires. Will I be able to notice the 1.7" difference in diamater with running 33" instead?

Anyone have a pic of a dodge with a 4-6" lift running 33"?


Thanks,

Richard
 
  #2  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:59 PM
cheapbeater's Avatar
cheapbeater
cheapbeater is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

you are going to need BIGGER tires with 6'' lift... and i dont think you need to lift to fit 33's the stock tires are 33's (maybe not on a daytona...) maybe they told you to lift because of the offset of the wheels??
otherwise i dont think you NEED to lift to fit those tires, maybe level it...
one of the lift gurus will chime in
 
  #3  
Old 10-14-2009, 10:09 PM
Shiloh 24's Avatar
Shiloh 24
Shiloh 24 is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: El Dorado, Kansas
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong but with 17's and 285/70/17's you won't need to do anything. Mine are stock 17's with 265/70/17's and they of course have no problem. The 285 simply means the tire is wider which if anything only mean's you'll need to mess with your back spacing. So you don't even need a lift of any sort to fit these tires and wheels, unless you want to level it for more front end clearance. If you do decide on the lift I personally would go with a 4" spindle lift with blocks in the rear. I don't like the idea of raising my center of gravity since I already drive like a freakin cop and take corners at 30 or more all the time.
 
  #4  
Old 10-14-2009, 10:13 PM
Ridinhigh's Avatar
Ridinhigh
Ridinhigh is offline
All Star
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

dont need a lift for the 33" tires and a 4-6" lift will look to high for 33's so get 35's and the rancho 4" quick lift is what hammer is running on 35's and no problems
 
  #5  
Old 10-14-2009, 10:53 PM
SurfnSocal's Avatar
SurfnSocal
SurfnSocal is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys, forgot to mention-

the Dick Cepek DC-1's (wheels) have an offset that will not fit without a lift.

My buddy said the RC lift, although a bigger lift, would be better because it replaces more stock parts (something about center of gravity). Whereas the CST is just spindles.

???
 
  #6  
Old 10-14-2009, 10:53 PM
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
weedahoe is offline
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South GA
Posts: 19,167
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Ive got a 6" lift with 36s. You can look in my sig for a link to my gallery if you wanna see some pics.
 
  #7  
Old 10-15-2009, 12:10 AM
CreativeOffroad's Avatar
CreativeOffroad
CreativeOffroad is offline
Captain
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both are good choices. I personally have the Rough Country kit, and its a great kit for what it costs.
 
  #8  
Old 10-15-2009, 03:39 AM
SurfnSocal's Avatar
SurfnSocal
SurfnSocal is offline
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CreativeOffroad
Both are good choices. I personally have the Rough Country kit, and its a great kit for what it costs.
Thanks! Do you have any other pics of your truck from the side?

I'm really hung up on 33 vrs. 35. Technically, the difference is 1.7". Is that really noticeable?
 
  #9  
Old 10-15-2009, 07:09 AM
weedahoe's Avatar
weedahoe
weedahoe is offline
Hall Of Fame
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South GA
Posts: 19,167
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I would say so because I had 32s and went to 36s. Now I know thats 4" total but thats only 2" on the top and another 2" on the bottom. I get people all the time telling me how huge they are but they areny that big to me. I think Im just used to them.
 



Quick Reply: CST 4" or Rough Country 6"?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.