3rd Gen Ram Tech 2002-2008 Rams: This section is for TECHNICAL discussions only, that involve the 2002 through 2008 Rams Rams. For any non-tech discussions, please direct your attention to the "General discussion/NON-tech" sub sections.

Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 05-09-2005 | 03:40 PM
Drew's Avatar
Drew
Professional
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: 33.43.342, 84.21.602
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

this guy uses his truck for plugin his place of buisness, and it's lifted high enough that his door handles are even with about the top of my truck and it's a 4x4 with the off road package (about 2 inches higher)

 
  #32  
Old 05-09-2005 | 04:29 PM
moparturd's Avatar
moparturd
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

That truck is just plain sick!
 
  #33  
Old 05-09-2005 | 07:50 PM
GMsucks's Avatar
GMsucks
Record Breaker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

ORIGINAL: mopartodd

That truck is just plain sick!
yeah, sick

[IMG]local://upfiles/3743/300CFBC7F6BC43CEA4927C7DE2994154.gif[/IMG]
 
  #34  
Old 05-09-2005 | 07:57 PM
Randy_W's Avatar
Randy_W
Professional
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

Cheap interiors, underpowered engines,
My wife's Bravada has 4.2 liter inline 6 DOHC with VVT, it has 275 h.p. My 4.6 liter Cadillac has 300 h.p. (they have since the early '90's), the new Northstar has 320 h.p. The supercharged version is 4.4 L with 440 h.p. I'll put the interiors of those 2 up against anything Chrysler has ever built for sale in North America.
 
  #35  
Old 05-09-2005 | 08:05 PM
GMsucks's Avatar
GMsucks
Record Breaker
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

ORIGINAL: Randy_W

Cheap interiors, underpowered engines,
My wife's Bravada has 4.2 liter inline 6 DOHC with VVT, it has 275 h.p. My 4.6 liter Cadillac has 300 h.p. (they have since the early '90's), the new Northstar has 320 h.p. The supercharged version is 4.4 L with 440 h.p. I'll put the interiors of those 2 up against anything Chrysler has ever built for sale in North America.
That's all fine and dandy. Yep the numbers say 4.2L VVT 275HP, but what happens when you stand on the gas? Don't even get me started on overpriced Cadillac Poopy.
And comparing interiors? Give me a break, they all look good the day you buy them. Let's listen to that GM Poopy interior rattle and buzz a year after the car was put into service. GM thinks NVH is translated into New Vehicle Harmonics, cause they sure don't have any explanation for the rattle, piston slappin pieces of crap a year later!
 
  #36  
Old 05-09-2005 | 08:15 PM
Randy_W's Avatar
Randy_W
Professional
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?


ORIGINAL: GMsucks

ORIGINAL: Randy_W

Cheap interiors, underpowered engines,
My wife's Bravada has 4.2 liter inline 6 DOHC with VVT, it has 275 h.p. My 4.6 liter Cadillac has 300 h.p. (they have since the early '90's), the new Northstar has 320 h.p. The supercharged version is 4.4 L with 440 h.p. I'll put the interiors of those 2 up against anything Chrysler has ever built for sale in North America.
That's all fine and dandy. Yep the numbers say 4.2L VVT 275HP, but what happens when you stand on the gas? Don't even get me started on overpriced Cadillac Poopy.
And comparing interiors? Give me a break, they all look good the day you buy them. Let's listen to that GM Poopy interior rattle and buzz a year after the car was put into service. GM thinks NVH is translated into New Vehicle Harmonics, cause they sure don't have any explanation for the rattle, piston slappin pieces of crap a year later!

My Caddy is a '96 with 94,000 miles, it looks and runs as well as it did when it was new. The interiors are fine, I don't have rattles, except a couple in '67. My wife's Olds is quicker by a good bit than my 5.9 Durango with 3.92 gears, was. Yes some LS style engines have piston slap, but it's nowhere near the problem you make it to be. Some Hemis have a tick, that doesn't make them junk. Chrysler trannys failed at an alarming rate in the '90's trucks, the plenum gaskets failed regularly, they knew it and did nothing to correct it for years, everyone has issues.
 
  #37  
Old 05-09-2005 | 09:13 PM
Avanti's Avatar
Avanti
Captain
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

I suggest you read the comments about the "new" Colorado in the new Car & Driver. Not much good to say about it and rated at the bottom of the "little" trucks tested.

Imho, the best part of GM trucks, at least some, is the LS-based V/8. I've lived with an LS-engine in my daily driver for a while and love it. The new hemi 1500 I've ordered will swap out daily driver duty with the C-5 Vette. Both fine engines.

All the best.
 
  #38  
Old 05-09-2005 | 09:21 PM
guido7's Avatar
guido7
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

Damn, aint this been interesting.... IMO just enjoy what you want.... I remember having a ford pinto hatchback and it was a blast to drive...soooo, what ever trips your trigger, "go for it".....

had a caddy STS... could put a lotta bodies in the trunk, and still haul ***.....heheheheeeeee..


Im outa' here.....................GUIDO.................... ........................................wooooo sh'


now THIS is fun.........

[IMG]local://upfiles/13612/99D0CD3E56224EC8A2F5C2C00AEFF21C.jpg[/IMG]
 
  #39  
Old 05-09-2005 | 11:21 PM
moparturd's Avatar
moparturd
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,136
Likes: 1
From:
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

remember having a ford pinto hatchback and it was a blast to drive
I just love Pintos. I prefer the wagons though.
 
  #40  
Old 05-10-2005 | 01:21 AM
IrishRagE's Avatar
IrishRagE
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?

Both fine engines
You must be joking. The LS2 is a fine motor...GM finally took their heads out of their ***** and designed heads to match the bore of the cylinder. 20% of LS1 motors have piston slap...a la, my 04 GTO PIECE OF SHI%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh...the C-5 has that very same motor...seems GM is fine with selling 55,000 dollar cars with piece of crap motors(20%). GM can FU$@ off.

Bitter? Absolutely...making a mistake is fine but own up to it and fix your mistakes. That is where GM lost my loyalty forever. Every company designs a random POS...but it's how they own up to it that matters to me...GM failed in that endeavor miserably.
 


Quick Reply: Sooo, GM just plain sucks?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.