Superchips Questions and Updates

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #951  
Old 07-27-2009, 11:19 PM
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn's Avatar
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
SeVeReDiStOrTiOn is offline
Record Breaker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SC removing TM is pretty ballsy...you know how ram guys are about their trannys giving out. There isn't much gain from it (all TM does is pull timing during the shift once in gear timing is back) and the extra stress on the driveline isn't worth it IMO. I'm really surprised they're doing it.
 
  #952  
Old 07-27-2009, 11:45 PM
SilsHemi's Avatar
SilsHemi
SilsHemi is offline
All Star
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
SC removing TM is pretty ballsy...you know how ram guys are about their trannys giving out. There isn't much gain from it (all TM does is pull timing during the shift once in gear timing is back) and the extra stress on the driveline isn't worth it IMO. I'm really surprised they're doing it.
It'll be a user adjustable option. Since Superchips (the leader in Ram TCM progamming) is applying the routine, I think it will be perfectly fine. The engineer has thought this out.


Sil
 
  #953  
Old 07-28-2009, 07:54 AM
Off_Road_Teacher's Avatar
Off_Road_Teacher
Off_Road_Teacher is offline
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So Sil, you were running it with zero TM?
 
  #954  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:05 AM
xfeejayx's Avatar
xfeejayx
xfeejayx is offline
3rd gen Ram, Newbies
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SeVeReDiStOrTiOn
SC removing TM is pretty ballsy...you know how ram guys are about their trannys giving out. There isn't much gain from it (all TM does is pull timing during the shift once in gear timing is back) and the extra stress on the driveline isn't worth it IMO. I'm really surprised they're doing it.
and baby the trans into gear, then slowly let the power on...in the meantime i'm eating popcorn and waiting for something to happen.

Damn, ZERO TM is kinda scary...don't know if I would try that.
 
  #955  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:44 AM
SilsHemi's Avatar
SilsHemi
SilsHemi is offline
All Star
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Off_Road_Teacher
So Sil, you were running it with zero TM?
Correct. The test program is set up that way.

Also, the engineer has found an even better way to deal with TM and he'll incorporate it in the upcoming release.


Sil
 
  #956  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:48 AM
xfeejayx's Avatar
xfeejayx
xfeejayx is offline
3rd gen Ram, Newbies
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

****! Scott, where is this Beta man?! how come Sil gets to have all the fun?!!
 
  #957  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:48 AM
SilsHemi's Avatar
SilsHemi
SilsHemi is offline
All Star
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xfeejayx
Damn, ZERO TM is kinda scary...don't know if I would try that.
That's the beauty of this program. Doesn't have to be zero. You'll be able to set it where you like it best.

I don't think it's as scary as having a 7000 Rev/Shift limit available to max out and blow a transmission.


Sil
 
  #958  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:50 AM
SilsHemi's Avatar
SilsHemi
SilsHemi is offline
All Star
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xfeejayx
****! Scott, where is this Beta man?! how come Sil gets to have all the fun?!!
hehe

In it's current format, you probably wouldn't want to run it. We're testing piece by piece and the GUI is changing frequently.


Sil
 
  #959  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:56 AM
Drangiz's Avatar
Drangiz
Drangiz is offline
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm sure this question has been asked before, but seeing as it is a 96 page long thread, and it is just a quick one, I'm asking again. Having a 2003 Ram with the HEMI in it, which programmer is considered better, the model 3865 or the 3950 Cortex? Is there a huge difference between them?

Thanks.
 
  #960  
Old 07-28-2009, 08:58 AM
carusso1's Avatar
carusso1
carusso1 is offline
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Castle, Pa
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just recently purchased a Cortex for my 08 Hemi Ram 1500. Can someone please describe what types of gains I should be seeing. So far I have not noticed anything other than a slight change in how it shifts while running the 91 tune. I have owned the programmer for approximately 3-weeks now and have run all the programs with the required fuel. My truck appears to have had a loss in power as a result of the re-update. I have contacted Superchips regarding this loss in performance and they are working on it. Their suggestion was to re-update the programmer and re-run them in my truck. I did the re-update and got nothing. Any other suggestions?

Thanks.
 


Quick Reply: Superchips Questions and Updates



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.